Pearl of Wisdom

when he was asked regarding Allah's verse: Call Me and I will hear your [supplications] 'So why does it happen that we supplicate and are not answered?' replied, 'Because your hearts have been treacherous in eight areas, the first of them being that you know Allah but you do not fulfil your right towards Him as is obligatory upon you, so your inner knowledge of Him has not benefited you at all... so then which supplication will be answered for you with this [state of affairs] after you have blocked its doors and paths?!'

Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib [as]
A 'lam al-Din, p. 269

Latest Answers

Receive Qul Updates

Name:
Email:



Ask Qul - QA
Question : #238 Category: Hajj & Umrah
Subject: rules in Hajj
Question: Would prevention by law, of slaughtering at Mina be sufficient to realise the inability to carry out slaughtering there, especially, if there was reason to believe that a financial or physical harm could ensue, should the law be broken?
Answer: Fear of consequential harm for breaking the law should lift the obligation of slaughtering at Mina. It must not be understood, though, that slaughtering elsewhere would make up for slaughtering in it. However, what makes slaughtering elsewhere in order is [indeed] Mina’s small capacity to host all pilgrims as discussed in Manisikul Hajj.
Apparently, slaughtering was made impossible, for the reasons mentioned in the question, not for the smallness of Mina? Therefor, combining both slaughtering outside Mina and fasting in lieu of hady (sacrificial offering) should be in order, as a matter of ihtiyat luzumi.

If you require further clarification on this answer, please use the feature to respond to the stated answer.
Copyright © 2026 Qul. All Rights Reserved.
Developed by B19 Design.