Pearl of Wisdom

Piety is the master of action. He who does not have piety to prevent him from an act of disobedience to Allah Almighty when left with it, Allah will not care about any of his other actions. This means that it [piety] is fear of Allah, both in secret and in public, economizing both in poverty and wealth, and fairness both in [times of] contentment and discontentment.'

Prophet Muhammad al-Mustafa [sawa]
Kanz al-'Ummal, no. 7299

Latest Answers

Receive Qul Updates

Name:
Email:



Ask Qul - QA
Question : #238 Category: Hajj & Umrah
Subject: rules in Hajj
Question: Would prevention by law, of slaughtering at Mina be sufficient to realise the inability to carry out slaughtering there, especially, if there was reason to believe that a financial or physical harm could ensue, should the law be broken?
Answer: Fear of consequential harm for breaking the law should lift the obligation of slaughtering at Mina. It must not be understood, though, that slaughtering elsewhere would make up for slaughtering in it. However, what makes slaughtering elsewhere in order is [indeed] Mina’s small capacity to host all pilgrims as discussed in Manisikul Hajj.
Apparently, slaughtering was made impossible, for the reasons mentioned in the question, not for the smallness of Mina? Therefor, combining both slaughtering outside Mina and fasting in lieu of hady (sacrificial offering) should be in order, as a matter of ihtiyat luzumi.

If you require further clarification on this answer, please use the feature to respond to the stated answer.
Copyright © 2026 Qul. All Rights Reserved.
Developed by B19 Design.